Firefox won't quit normally w/ Ubiquity enabled, nom noms memory

[fernandotakai.wordpress.com]

Right now, if you try to use the email verb like this: "email this to foo@…", the noun_type_contact does not recognize the email (in fact, it tries to find a contact with that name) and it should as it is a valid email.

[fernandotakai.wordpress.com]

This patch adds an regex that validates if the email is valid and adds to the suggestion list.

[jonoscript.wordpress.com]

Patch accepted in dc41e72aaf71

[hyper.to/blog]

gTLDs can be longer than 4 chars, e.g. .museum, and recent ICANN ruling is that any gTLD can be registered (to be implemented in 2009). See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-level_domain .

Also, there are many other characters allowed and in use for the account name part.

Could use the following regexp, which mostly conforms to RFC2822:

(deleted during migration from sqlite to mysql)

I've definitely seen use of plus, dollar and equal signs.

[hyper.to/blog]

Yikes, that got munged.

Here it is again:

(deleted during migration from sqlite to mysql)

[blur.myopenid.com]

Due to the shortcomings of the existing regex, I'm re-opening the ticket.

Also, that revised regex won't work for an internationalized domain name (IDN). Or an internationalized mailbox.

It would be fine if it could be matched against the Punycode format of the IDN, but I'm not sure if Firefox exposes any API for converting between the two formats.

However, since its all just Unicode anyway, the following Unicode ranges should work when added to the existing character ranges:

u00A0-uD7FFuF900-uFDCFuFDF0-uFFEF

Also, I think in the long term we should have the domain name regex put into noun_type_domainname. That way noun_type_contact can rely on noun_type_domainname for validating the domain, and specialize solely on validating the mailbox portion of an email address.

Going further with that idea, noun_type_contact shouldn't be validating email addresses - only known contacts. Instead, it should rely on noun_type_emailaddress, which will use the above regex. Or perhaps have a third noun type that combines noun_type_emailaddress and noun_type_contact. Will need to figure out a naming scheme in that case - possibly noun_type_email_address, noun_type_email_contact, with noun_type_email combining them.

[fernandotakai.wordpress.com]

We could translate this regex to javascript - its compatible to rfc 882 and them create a noun_type_email_address.

[www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=aitoawkexd4rfvidlynvt2seg96forifpnj3k58]

Is it really so important to only ever match a valid email address according to several standards, using a debatable regex? (I don't actually have a problem with the regex itself, but it's already been debated, hence "debatable".) After all, the address is given as a suggestion to a user, who can take it or leave it. My preference would be to let the user type just about anything in, matching /.@./ and let it go. If there's a contact's name with an at sign in it, then that should be in the suggestions list too. Keep the regex simple (and unchanging) and let the user decide if the suggestions are correct.

[abcdefu.wordpress.com]

I agree. In fact, I think we should allow any input even if it is not an email. This is because of this situation - say you type "email hi to aasda", if you don't have such a contact in your address book, then Ubiquity basically gives no suggestions. So, the user thinks he's done something wrong. And even if you continue typing "email hi to aasda@g" and this is accepted as valid input, its likely the user won't even try since he doesn't think this is possible.

I should articulate this better but does this reasoning make sense?

Actually, this "no preview shown if nountype is wrong" problem is a Ubiquity-wide problem that needs to be addressed (perhaps by telling the user what they're doing wrong rather than showing no preview or suggestions).

[atul.toolness.com]

Milestone Command Updates deleted

[me.yahoo.com/a/fdd90cg9icmsicxvoyjf4zcwm.tm7dh0#f4bbc]

#252 (noun_type_contact should accept a valid email as an option) – Ubiquity – Trac

[me.yahoo.com/a/fdd90cg9icmsicxvoyjf4zcwm.tm7dh0#f4bbc]

#252 (noun_type_contact should accept a valid email as an option) – Ubiquity – Trac

[www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=aitoawmtb3gjpkmn8lsxu5paedcc7hdyekstayq]

We are providing all kinds of louis vuitton handbags, wallets and purses in ourgucci Online Store, all items of which have the most popular styles and are the newest and at discounted prices.

We also provide helpful shopping guide tips for you to choose and compare our bags and other accessories. Get your sale of replica handbags today and you will never be disappointed with it.

[www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=aitoawlb9bmbiqglcp9flmc9_cfigsheyqr1yc0]

Welcome to our company, our company Huayi Trade Co.,LTD are good at selling the top quality designer bags (Balenciaga ,Chanel , Chloe' ,Christian Dior ,Dolce&Gabbana , Fendi , Gucci , Hermes , Galliera GM ,Miu Miu , Prada ), they are mirror image bags which are identical to the real onesLouis Vuitton Galliera GM . Our company locates inthe leather town in China, Speedy 25since 2003 we did this business we have won great trust and popularity from our customers from all over the world. We areexpanding our business, any inquiry for wholesale business is warmly welcome, Louis Vuitton Speedy 25just contact us, you can get our prompt reply.We have enlish speaking representative to answer phone call, or we can call you if convenient for you.

[www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=aitoawkclkx2iowpzwyrxpiaq6wrdn-gz_z3spc]

When the economy became a bit less predictable, more women started looking for ways to make their wedding dresses a little less costly. Some women opted to donate their used wedding dresses to other brides-to-be. Others still choose to cherish this garment, saving it for future daughters or granddaughters to wear in their weddings.

The new shop, designer wedding gowns, is almost directly opposite his existing ready-to-wear and couture boutique, at No. 27, which opened in 1984.

The models this week were nine divorcees who were willing to give their designer wedding dresses major makeovers! The designers had to turn old wedding dress into a hip outfit they “can wear in the next chapter of their lives.”